Theatre Thursday 5/12/16

Before Brie Larson won the Oscar for Best Actress in “Room,” she still acted. It wasn’t a sudden impulse and then, boom - academy award. That would be pretty cool (about as cool as Daisy Ridley's first studio film being "The Force Awakens" which is true)! 

I don’t know her entire filmography like some IMDb stalking weirdo. But I do know that Brie Larson appeared in the film, “Short Term 12,” before she won the Oscar. 

I saw that film on Netflix a few years ago and remember thinking, ‘ooh, that was pretty good.’ Since she took home her Oscar I’ve revisited the film, specifically observing Larson's performance. Over time my like of the film grew. She may have provided an even better performance in “Short Term 12” than she did in “Room.” It was relatable and touching. Of course neither situation was particularly relatable on a broad scale (at least for me) but, on a human one, both were. Still, I think I enjoyed “Short Term 12” a little more. 

So, if the task to hand out acting awards fell to me, well if it fell to me I’ld probably give some others and everything might be a little different…, but if the task of handing out acting awards fell to me I would exchange Brie Larson's. She'd get it for “Short Term 12” instead of “Room.”

short term 12 movie poster

Wildcard Wednesday 5/11/16

As we shopped Unique LA the other weekend, which we tend to do a few times annually (cause we’re are unique and live in LA so it’s kinda required right?), we came across a clothing booth. We were already perusing the wears when the proprietor’s enthusiasm for the products set the hook. Except maybe that’s not quite the right analogy because we weren’t prey. It was a shared experience. But I don’t know the fitting analogy, and what I mean is that his enthusiasm intrigued us and the benefits of the product enticed us. So even though it wasn’t necessarily a predatory exchange I guess “setting the hook” works alright.

At Unique we always make rounds and then come back to necessary places to avoid the almost guaranteed impulse buy. It provides an out to escape the sales pressure otherwise.

But we came back to this place. The clothing material seemed amazing and the messages upon it evoked amazingness and the money the business received in exchange for the clothes went toward an amazing purpose. If I could sum it up in one word I would probably call it amazing. 

“For Every Shirt Sold, We Give One Bag Of Groceries To A Child In Need”

A good purchase toward a good cause. We were happy with the overall experience. Then, as I flipped the channels the other night, I saw a familiar face at the end of a news segment. The proprietor we purchased from at Unique promoting the quality of his product. I only caught the end but I already felt pride in his words. I thought to myself, “choir, he preaches the truth. Good job us.”

www.fbnw.us 

Our mission is to spread happiness; we do this by providing a bag of food to a child in need for EVERY shirt we sell.

Our mission is to spread happiness; we do this by providing a bag of food to a child in need for EVERY shirt we sell.

Taco Tuesday 5/10/16

L.A. represents its own unique place, mostly because it’s its own unique place. A culture all it’s own. One way this manifests is in the food. 

Both the larger culture and the food culture developed into things that I really appreciate. So was I drawn to L.A. or did L.A. lure me in? (Well I can’t really say I had much choice in the matter so I wouldn’t say that L.A. lured me in. But I also doubt that the second largest city in the country changed to conform to my unannounced preferences. More than likely a symbiotic evolution occurred that benefited us both.) 

Food and culture usually evolve hand in hand, like two lovers merrily strolling down a boardwalk. L.A.’s developed its own way of dinning just as it’s developed its own personality as a place. The specific dinning culture isn’t one I necessarily knew of until I read this article but it is one I whole heartedly approve of (because I am the definitive mark of excellence in anything. There are James Beard awards, Oscars, Grammys, Tonys… me.) 

While I’ve never been to a fantastical restaurant-ish home prepared meal, I have eaten really good food prepared by others, medium-small house parties are quite common, and I enjoy and appreciate good food and good people. So, I’m capable of mentally combining the elements. Also, the article refers to a “smorgasbord” which, in addition to applying to this website as well as the specific food, applies generally to L.A. 

Maybe I don’t possess enough of the requisite knowledge currency the article points to, but I do possess enough awareness of the place to agree with the changed tune of even “notorious haters” of L.A. in raving that it presents some great dinning options. Great dinning options because the place houses great people (for example: me!) who might choose to make you some of their great food.

Musical Monday 5/9/16

The youth is taking over music! The youth is coming! The youth! OMG, MGMT  said so. 

Ok, no, not really. But they do say “the youth,” a bunch in the song which brought it to mind. More than likely there are a normal number of young performers ascending to a usual position in cultural zeitgeist. These are just two that I happen to know of. Hardly a revolution.

The thing that makes them special to my perspective is that I’ve actually heard of them and they actually sing catchy songs that don’t seem like they would come from the youth.

Jake Bugg: 

Declan McKenna: 

But it’s not like their relevance signals the coming apocalypse for elders. There are plenty of other young and talented performers performing. I think Lorde is like really young and also good (I mean the Boss did cover her so she must be). Likewise, Bo Burnham does comedy music very well. 

In addition to youth, they’re talented too. And I’m sure that fails to even scratch the surface. I'm somewhat happy to think that we exist in the same world and these youths have so much time to impact it. Time creates more opportunity and being so skilled so young provides a lot of opportunity.

Freedom Friday 5/6/16

I was entirely unaware of this up until I was aware. But that doesn’t mean it didn’t exist. If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound? Yes. I’m pretty sure it does. It creates waves that we are capable of detecting. And if we can’t hear it does it still make the waves? Probably yes. We obviously can't be absolutely sure of anything unless we witness it first hand but we can look at the evidence. Every falling tree always creates audible waves because physics. 

And just like I am pretty sure that a tree that I don’t necessarily hear makes a sound when it falls, I am also pretty sure that Patton Oswalt feels loss and pain. Just because I was unaware doesn’t change his experience of events. It doesn’t mean he was any more or less sad. With the same reasoning, historical events were real things that happened to real people like you and me.

And now I am aware. Now I can witness and can pass along the news. Side note, his devastation after loss of a life is obvious. I’m making somewhat of a jump, but I think that most people’s lives are fairly equivalent, at least they have similar potential. So, the loss of Patton Oswalt’s wife equates to the loss of life for anyone. Deaths that occur endlessly leave “craters” in lives.

http://time.com/4316653/patton-oswalt-remembers-michelle-mcnamara/

time.com

time.com

Ehh. But that’s all very heavy stuff and I don’t want to weigh you down too much heading into the weekend. As R. Kelly profoundly sang out, “it’s the freakin weekend baby, I’m about to have me some fun.” On that note:

 

A horse walks up to a bar. The bartender asks, “Why the long face?”

(someone)

Theatre Thursday 5/5/16 (Cinco de Mayo!!!)

A parade on TV. (snore) Fireworks! (woohoo) Ha, now you’re off balance. So I’m going to suggest something in between. A book. Hopefully my recommendation moves it more towards fireworks, unless you’re a dog. Dogs don’t generally like fireworks. So if you’re a dog, then not like fireworks, like a treat. But if you’re a dog how can you read? Woof, woof. Bark. Woof. Ok, sorry. Back to the book. See you’re already pining for a book recommendation.

Everyone and anyone, you, should read “Ready Player One.” It's not some brick of esoteric literature. It is page turning fun. While everyone should, you especially should if you like 80’s pop-culture or early video games or future philosophy.

And now, because others felt the same way, a movie is being made from the book. When I read the book I could easily picture it theatrically. And guess who is directing that movie? Ok, I’ll tell you, it’s Steven Spielberg. Yes, Steven MF’n Spielberg (I doubt that’s actually his middle name, I just wanted to emphasize him cause he’s awesome). Steven Spielberg is signed on to direct with a host of interesting actors.

I might be getting overly excited but that’s just because it’s exciting. This has all the makings of an epic classic. In Spielbergian vernacular maybe ET meets Minority Report? With an 80s pop-culture flare and great actors? I’m down. While “Bridge of Spies” played well to 70 and 80 year olds hopefully this aims to capture a younger demographic. I'm ready.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1677720/

Wildcard Wednesday 5/4/16

Here's my hardline, no-exception, absolute rule (because no compromise is the best way always!): the name of a professional sports team should stay with its place of origin. If I’m deciding a rule applicable to the ownership of a professional sports franchise I decide on that rule immediately. I believe that strikes a fair balance between the freedom of the entrepreneur and the investment of the local fans. A good name, the best names (according to me), intentionally reflect the place (sure probably in order to attract monetary gain, but ideally commerce and the broader reality seamlessly commingle. Am I right? I think I'm right).

In order to secure a consistent stream of funds the franchise needs to appeal to the people that can realistically and regularly attend the competitions. Fans in the immediate area can realistically and regularly attend consistently. Ingratiating the team to them makes good business sense. But, removing the team and the franchise history from the place removes the foundation on which the fandom rests. It’s quid pro quo. This for that. Except one side has the option to remove the “this” on a whim. To hold those who want “this” hostage, demanding extreme “that” as the ransom. Usually “that” constitutes a new stadium or building. Notice that "hostage" and "ransom" aren't particularly positive terms but I think they're probably accurate.

Now the argument can be made that a rule of that form limits the freedom of the owner who paid money for that team. Of course the one making that argument probably holds an array of personal beliefs that already conflict with my supposition. However, I would contest that the owner of a team seeks benefit from the community, and intentionally appeals to them. It seems fair then to imply a relationship between the broader community and the ownership of a franchise. But, the owner is free to leave whenever the owner decides, sticking the community with the remainder after the absence. That violates the implied relationship. Plus I’m generally supportive of a cool name over free enterprise for sport’s team owners. Power to the people!

Listing names of a few professional sports franchises and explaining what makes them good or bad demonstrates efficacy, or the lack of. The Utah Jazz. The Milwaukee Brewers. I’m from Wisconsin so that probably helps foreshadow my preferences.    

The Utah Jazz. One thing that definitely comes to mind when I think jazz music: the State of Utah. An impromptu jazz jam might erupt out of nothing down the street anywhere in Utah. Let me take you to funky town, or as some know it Salt Lake City. It is Utah after all. Oh, Utah's not funky? It's not jazzy? Not at all? In fact jazz is maybe the antithesis of the general conception of Utah? Hmmm. That seems counterintuitive. Maybe Utah is ironically jazzy? I guess they should be the popular hipster franchise or something.

The Jazz actually originated in New Orleans. Ahhh. New Orleans and jazz music. Wow. That actually makes complete sense. Those two seem to match perfectly. New Orleans, a funky, rhythmic haven? Absolutely. Knowing that, I can’t help but feel a little disappointment every time of hear something about the Utah Jazz or the New Orleans Pelicans. Oh what was and what should still be.

Alternatively, the Milwaukee Brewers. People often refer to Milwaukee as“cream city,” referring to brick color. But, more applicable here, Milwaukee also often receives another moniker, “brew city.” Laverne and Shirley (that was a TV show back in the day) lived in Milwaukee and worked at a brewery. A slogan of Schlitz beer was, “Schlitz, the Beer that made Milwaukee Famous.” Beer and Milwaukee have grown to become synonymous with each other. I remember the smell of yeast from the various breweries permeating the vehicle as we drove through Milwaukee in my childhood. So the name of the baseball team explicitly appeals to the community. Brewers make beer. Especially in a small market, the local fan base and the team must form a symbiotic relationship for the team to even survive much less thrive. 

Despite the difficulties, enough success and money can overcome the struggles a name might create. But why create unnecessary struggle if the goal is monetary gain? The Lakers originated in Minnesota. I wasn’t around when they moved or I would have railed, likely unsuccessfully, for “Lakers” to stay in Minnesota. Now the Timberwolves could be the Lakers and the L.A. Lakers could be something relevant to people in Los Angeles. Minnesota is a place where the populace identifies with the concept of lakes. Naming the basketball team after lakes appealed directly to the populace. The Minneapolis Lakers is a cool name. Really cool.

I currently live in Los Angeles. I have never heard a single person make a single utterance about L.A.’s lakes. L.A has no lakes! At least not many and certainly not prominent, dominating ones. LA’s near the ocean. Not only does the name, the LA Lakers, seem random and arbitrary when applied to L.A. but it seems extra those things because it so fittingly applies to the originating place. Since removing the team from Minnesota effectively severed any meaning from the name between the new fans and and the franchise, the ownership leveraged success and money to fill the hole. Of course, many fanbases would more than accept that trade off, but for many fanbases that option fails to exist. Especially in a small market, the franchise cannot usually afford to consistently put out a winning product - and spending never really guarantees winning anyway. 

If an owner arrives at the decision that it makes monetary sense to transfer locations, monetary concerns clearly supersede others for them. A locality from which a team departs cannot choose to make a team suddenly viable. If the the owner has chosen to place finances above all else, as most owners will, then it makes little sense to carry a previously locationally incisive name with anyway. It makes much more sense for the owner to appeal directly to the likely already extremely interested fanbase by directly tying the team name to the place. It signifies a commitment of the owner to the locality for a longer term. 

So, it seems to make the most sense for a franchise to create a new name when arriving in a new place if the franchise plans to even attempt creating any sort of connection to the new locality. And, since the old name no longer bares any relevance, it also makes sense to leave it where it came from. “What’s in a name?” Apparently a lot!

Taco Tuesday 5/3/16

So far, at every Passover Seder Dinner I’ve attended, I always win the trivia contest. I'm batting 1,000. ‘The huh?’ those who’ve attended other Seders may wonder. Well, let me try to explain, as much as I can within the extreme limits of my understanding. 

Most Seders don’t have trivia (but the cool ones that I go to do). Apparently usually some elder attendee hides a piece of matzah, the afikoman (?), and then children scour the premises like police detectives trying to solve a murder. With no Jesus bunny to hide multiple colored eggs the “lucky” Jewish youths “get” to hunt for the sole chunk of hidden matzah.

But, with our event devoid of children, we lacked any interested detectives to investigate. And the ample wine made the many adults in attendance indifferent to “winning” a search. I know that given the choice between looking behind picture frames and under chairs or not-doing-that-and-continuing-to-drink-wine, I would have chosen the latter. So our hosts, in their wisdom, replaced the hunt with something more engaging and appropriate for the attendees. 10 questions of trivia. Bars often employ a similar tactic in an attempt to engage patrons. 

Success. I was engaged. And, obviously, I won. In a room full of worldly and intelligent people I was the best one. That’s what the quiz indisputably proved.

Initially I assumed that my only prize, in addition to the ego boost, would be the section of matzah. In my wine tinted perception this was more than adequate. But I happily learned the surprise that the winner received was a box of giant, handmade caramels. I like caramels so that only emphasized the win. The “cherry on top.” Except I don’t really like sundae-type cherries. Maybe, I don’t know, the strawberry on top? I do like strawberries so sure, the strawberry on top.

That Seder Dinner was my first. I expect to always at least compete for the caramel prize the trivia winner receives whenever I attend a Seder in the future. I don’t know if my reward was kosher or not. Maybe I’ll inquire further at future events.

Musical Monday 5/2/16

Musical covers take something already familiar for some and twist it. Like a chef deconstructing a dish. Separating the usual BLT into a B, an L, and a T. The next time you have a BLT it's a new experience. For others who were not already familiar, a cover might provide the first exposure to the material at all. When David Bowie died I recognized his great contributions and appreciated all he had done. I'm at least somewhat aware of the world. But I lacked a total appreciation for his full impact. I like all of his music fine. I do, I like it a lot. But it wasn’t until hearing others perform it that I obtained a fresh perspective on his work. That fresh perspective provided a better appreciation of the significance of his impact.

Hearing and watching, “Space Oddity,” performed by an astronaut, Commander Chris Hadfield, in space completely changed my perspective. It deconstructed the song by taking something I always listened to in one context (performed on Earth!) and very much twisting it (a performance on space station orbiting Earth!).

 

In a similar fashion, the Portuguese covers of Bowie by Seu Jorge, especially “Life on Mars” completely flipped my usual perspective of Bowie’s songs. I will admit that my Portuguese isn't in tip-top shape but the tune still captured my attention and the mystery of the lyrics might have made the songs even more alluring.

 

Hearing both of these interpretations of David Bowie’s work steeply escalated my appreciation for his creations and his own performances. I now saw these works in a new light. Then, with a new appreciation for the artist and his work established, he very unexpectedly died (while I mentioned before working on expecting the unexpected when dealing with mortality that's more of a group goal where I am part of the group than a lesson from the head of the class. And this happened well before Prince's "early" demise anyway).

Understandably, and more expectedly, a bevy of tributes issued forth acknowledging David Bowie's tremendous impact. The most effective tributes, in my mind, both came from the Tonight Show. I saw neither live (because on the West Coast the show airs at 11:30 (PM!) which is crazy late and provides no real opportunity to watch the show and have a normal morning! #Sorrynotsorry). Both appeared later on social media which is where I discovered and enjoyed them. 

(There was a link to the Michael Stipe video but it  no longer works. Bummer cause it was good. I guess the early bird gets the worm.)

It provides a true testament to work when the deconstruction of it continues AD. Especially when it continues to make the whole BLT taste so much better.

"It's gettin hot in herre"

The childhood fascination with fire probably, at least I would guess, arises from a false sense of control. Sure, maybe it served another purpose evolutionarily. Something super elevated and important. But that view, like a tall shelf, extends beyond the reach of the majority of children. In general, control of most things avoids children. Adults usually try to maintain control for the benefit of the children. In fact, when and how much control to afford a child precipitates many arguments among adults. Although a child may believe that the element of fire can be controlled, like many children themselves, it cannot.

But, regardless of why the fascination occurs, it occurs. And it occurred with me too. A friend across the street, whose parents smoked, could often easily access matches or a lighter. Sometimes I could obtain some other source of flame from my house. Although my parents weren’t smokers, creators of fire amount to useful household tools in general. The grill, candles, the basement’s wood-burning stove…lots of things benefited from on-demand fire summoning.  If we could not obtain the necessary purveyors of heat we would even resort to old fashioned means by using a magnifying glass to focus and direct the sun. Whatever the situation called for, our obsession dictated that we create fire. Stolen from the Olympian Gods and given directly to us. To me.

We constructed appropriate housings for the flames when necessary. These were not large bon-fires or blazing camp-fires, instead they were small combustions tantamount in size to the elementary schoolers creating them. Dried grass or leaves confined by the setting we deemed proper, some random bricks or rocks to create a tiny, make-shift wind block. Some suitable surrounding for our pyrotechnic machinations. 

The Fourth of July presented a unique opportunity to exercise our mastery. Fireworks developed into an accepted method of patriotic celebration for some absurd reason. Our family, and many others, purchased an armory of cheesy little snappers and poppers to annually mark the occasion. Along with a few bottle rockets and roman candles. Whiz, boom! 

Now, this seems like a tangent, but trust me it relates, I lived a few blocks from a totally different place. Partially manicured and partially wild, it lacked any of the human dwelling structures found in the surrounding, like my house. The space produced a park amidst the residential sprawl. A hidden wood-chipped trail encircled a natural pond deep within the woods, all set well behind a roadside playground and tennis court and half-basketball court. The place’s true purpose, for us, disguised to any passerby. Just a park. Just some boring old woods behind a playground and other plain park-type-things. Nothing else to see here. Just go about your normal business please. Thank you.

The location developed into the hidden home-base of extra-residential activities for my friends and I. In the middle of the suburbs it provided the opportunity to completely disappear. Someone somehow magically maintained the trail that circled the pond. Once a year we arrived to discover fresh wood chips along with cleared brush and a trimmed path. Maybe special trail elves visited in the night? At two points, streams connected to the central body of water. Ingress and egress for the pond. Solid wooden bridges across the streams provided easy passage. 

Almost daily I ventured into this place to let my dog run freely. She loved it. I loved it. The scenery seemed to block out reality. Friends and I often gathered in this secret wood. It belonged to us. So it developed into a place where we felt free to act naturally. For a time, acting naturally meant attempting to start small fires.

Along one of the streams we discovered an old tree-trunk, remnants of a past forest sentinel, now just two or three feet tall, sticking out of the mud. Inspired, we felt that a wooden tree trunk might provide appropriate fire fuel. Still, so much water surrounding it cast doubt on its potential efficacy. But it took little to move us to action after that “spark” of inspiration. Once the idea flickered it quickly fanned into a question of “how” not a question of “if.” To combat the doubts the surrounding water roused, we accumulated a wealth of currently available fireworks from our various residences. We packed them into the trunk, along with dried leaves and twigs and whatever else we found laying around, hopeful to create a mass of combustable energy.

Like the fuse to a bomb we lit some of the dry kindling we had added and backed far far away from…( I don’t know what we expected, a perfectly contained but amazing display?) it. From just beyond ground zero we watched the fire start slowly. First just the leaves and grass smoldered and smoked within an un-embroiled wooden shelter. The wet wood of the trunk denied its participation. Fairly anticlimactic given our grand expectations. But finally the heat escalated beyond the trunk’s ability to resist. Surrendering, the trunk itself erupted into flames. From nascent to hearty. For a brief second I felt pride in our accomplishment. Man marshals fire! But then the heat activated some of the fireworks. Sporadic shots of fire into an environment consisting of all sorts of fuel, and, to add to the spectacle, emanating from a central hub of fire.

Something more than fear engulfed me. Immediately I imagined the evening news reporting my participation in burning down the entire park. Concern for my own wellbeing sublimated to concern for my pride should I survive the catastrophe. Starting a huge forest fire for no legitimate reason. I could only point to my own musings as the motivation for the significant chaos. Surely not a legitimate justification for the devastation, for casting shame upon all associated with me. 

We immediately leapt into action spurred on by the display. The tree trunk was luckily rooted right next to the entering stream. My friend began splashing as much water as could be enticed by his cupped hands from the reservoir. I removed my shoe, the only vessel I perceived capable of containing any significant amount of liquid, and began using it to hurl water at the inferno. 

Apparently the combustion lacked the actual power we imagined it might contain. Our efforts successfully extinguished the blaze before it could expand to the whole park and then encompass surrounding homes and then the rest of the city and then the entire state…

Now I remained, standing in a muddy stream, slightly on an angle, facing a smoldering tree trunk that emanated wisps smoke. I stood there silently beside my friend. Both of us wet and frightened, reminded by the lightly smoking tree trunk of what could have been. How our lives came so close to being so different. How we had come within seconds of becoming fugitives from the law. How clearly fire could not be controlled.

Freedom Friday 4/29/16

When I go out to a bar or a restaurant, I usually try to wait as long as possible to use the facilities. First of all, “breaking the seal,” is the truth. When out for drinks or having drinks with dinner, the number of trips, at least in my experience, to the restroom increase significantly after the first. But also, the later in the evening the worse the state of the premises has grown so it’s really a catch-22. After delaying the trip as long as possible one must eventually succumb to nature’s loudly escalating call.

Locating the restroom at all may initially provide challenge. If you’re lucky, a cohort already used it and can inform you of the location. If not, an employee of the establishment must be interrogated. 

The restroom almost always hides somewhere in the back (out of sight out of mind I guess?). Some establishments take this proposition to the extreme. "Extreme" usually involves stairs, up or down. Also, some require a key for entrance. I guess it makes sense for them, giving them more control and limiting the use, but it’s also a large hassle for the customer. The most difficult experience I’ve encountered in a bathroom odyssey was a bathroom located across the building, up the stairs, through a second restaurant, and down a back hall. 

“Where’s Jim?” 

“Oh, he went to the bathroom. He should be back in an hour or so.”

Happily I didn’t need a key once I finally arrived at that one, but I don’t really think the bathroom needed a lock and key given the distance required. I’m surprised I didn’t find bodies of the unsuccessful along the way marking the path like Hansel and Gretel’s breadcrumbs. If we planned on staying much longer I might have needed to start my next departure as soon as I returned to the table.

However, once finally located, entering the bathroom might provide, upon entrance an added surprise. Sometimes, a nice gentleman (I’m assuming it’s a lady in the other room though I’ve never been) stands next to the sinks, dressed in the official uniform of an employee, with a basket or tip jar on the counter containing cash, and an array of mints and gum and cologne and I don’t know what else near the faucets. Upon discovering a bathroom attendant the loud and audible groan reflects my sudden and immediate distaste (why is it audible? I thought it was only in my head. You can hear that?).

No better way to treat the customers than making sure that using the restroom includes the opportunity to impose guilt. Obviously (hopefully) the attendant would not choose to spend free time in the bathroom. But now they are there, folding hand towels, waiting to pump soap. I hate it. It gnaws at my soul. The entire point of the establishment is to promote the eventual use of the restroom. Now once you, a paying customer, the lifeblood of the business, finally acquiesce, you confront someone doing everything but blatantly asking for your money in exchange for use. 

Additionally, it hurts knowing that plenty don’t tip the bathroom attendants. They escape a feeling of obligation through coarseness (at least I end up seeing it that way). The business basically monetarily rewards those crass and indifferent to others while sticking me with the charge. Sometimes the dirty scofflaws don’t wash their hands to avoid an awkward encounter. That’s even worse! Now they’re dirty jerks, brought to you by this place! It’s like the people who go to the farmers' market to try all the samples with no interest in actually buying anything. To them it’s just a free meal. Yeah, I know that’s my problem, not theirs (except for the dirty hands, that's everyone's problem). That I’m probably too sensitive, I overthink it, and I feel too much of an obligation, but my problem frustrates me! I hate when I’m made to feel feelings!

That being said, if I owned a bar or a restaurant, I might employ a bathroom attendant. 'Say wha?' I’ve cleaned bathrooms at bars before. I’ve also been in unattended bathrooms many many times. At the end of the evening bathrooms are a total mess. Unbelievably gross. Having someone there immediately makes users more considerate. If you're speeding down the highway and you see a police car you immediately slow down. Just the knowledge that someone might be actively watching completely changes the behavior of most. On top of that, I can’t imagine a bathroom attendant makes a significant base salary. The shaming tips must constitute a good portion of take home pay (which is why tipping the attendants should happen when it can and why others not tipping is infuriating). That means it probably doesn't cost the establishment a terrible amount in exchange for a much cleaner restroom.

So, what would I suggest, given both the usefulness of bathroom attendants and my utter distaste for them? I would suggest no tip jars. I would suggest they keep the premises clean and they get paid a reasonable amount. I would suggest that the customer sees them upon entrance but doesn’t have their services paraded before them upon exiting. I would suggest that using the restroom should be pleasurable just like all aspects an establishment seeks to provide patrons should be pleasurable.

How to eliminate the feeling of obligation to tip? I don’t know. Write it in the menu and put it on a sign in the bathroom. Culture will eventually change because that’s how it came to be in the first place. I didn’t even know these positions existed until coming from, I guess, the provincial to the more metropolitan and now I still prefer places that don't employ them. They are not a necessary part of business they are an element of a business strategy. I suggest changing that strategy.

Theatre Thursday 4/28/16

On average I probably go to the movies once every month or two. I see a lot more, I just don’t GO see them. I realize that for some that’s still a lot and for others that’s a paltry amount. As Popeye would declare, “I am what I am.”

So, in accordance with my habits, when a movie peaks my interest I must determine whether to go see it in a theatre or wait until I can see it at home? I already know that I will see it, but “should I stay or should I go,” becomes the question.

Big, epic blockbusters and other grand stories demand they be experienced, not just viewed. But most other films, especially those with a more manageable scale, screen adequately in the confines of the house, not necessitating the significant expenditure that theatre viewing entails.

Every once in awhile a movie walking the line between viewing experiences comes out. It questions whether I am willing to sacrifice the additional cost in exchange for quicker viewing.

This particular case is not an epic summer blockbuster as far as I can tell. It’s a slightly more intimate story than that. No space ships or aliens or giant explosions (I think). The movie is called, “The Nice Guys.” It stars Ryan Gosling and Russell Crowe. That might seem an odd pairing, but the trailers along with their Oscar presentation and the marketing attest to their chemistry as well as their capability for humor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49ifhCQvpVQ 

Additionally, Shane Black directs. Shane Black is responsible for one of my (semi-) recent favorite films, “Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang.” If the feeling of “The Nice Guys” proves in anyway similar to “Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang,” and the trailers indicate it does, I anticipate enjoying it. How I go about enjoying it is still up for debate. 

A private eye investigates the apparent suicide of a fading porn star in 1970s Los Angeles and uncovers a conspiracy.

A private eye investigates the apparent suicide of a fading porn star in 1970s Los Angeles and uncovers a conspiracy.

Wildcard Wednesday 4/27/16

In a previous post, on a Tuesday long long ago, I mentioned Dan Barber’s idea of responsibility and how actions metaphorically corresponded to deposits and withdrawals from a collective bank. I also mentioned that ideas of responsibility don’t always mesh since I disagreed at first with one conception of it. 

The idea of responsibility has, for a long time, dominated my thoughts. So naturally part of that analyzing involves pondering what responsibility means? I think there are actually two types of responsibility. 

On a small scale, micro-responsibility, like micro-economics, is what can be directly attributed to, or seen as a result of, your actions. This would be legal responsibility. A caused B to happen and A could guess C could potentially result. B did lead to bad result C. If not for A creating B, no C. How reasonable is the implication of C? If it’s very reasonable for C to flow from B then A is very responsible. If it is a stretch to think that C would flow from B then A is not that responsible. Legally, it’s a question of “reasonable.” You are only legally responsible for what you can “reasonably” foresee occurring. 

But, Dan Barber is discussing another, larger, type of responsibility. It opposes arguments that people don’t matter. “Why vote in elections when there are so many people? Why does one single drop of water matter in an endless ocean?” Dan Barber argues, I think, that “yes, in fact, your voice does matter.” 

If we view our actions as investments in a bank, and see that we all access that account, a global account for all people (unfortunately not a real account I have access to), we realize that every action in some way effects us. Macro-responsibility like macro-economics. You shouldn’t feel aimless and drowning. You shouldn’t feel like your actions are entirely pointless. You should feel like your actions are at least somewhat meaningful. They amount to a deposit or withdrawal that changes the account balance that some other entirely random person may confront. And they may change the balance you confront. 

In Dan Barber’s analogy the Earth, the world, our society is akin to the bank. Because you have access to the account, any action you take changes the available balance. You know that, so while you might not be legally held responsible for an action, you can reasonably assume that, because you can access the account, your actions may change the balance.

Taco Tuesday 4/26/16

Last year my wife and I ate at Guisados, a current LA staple. Things just seemed to work out for us. Parking, although not wonderful, did not constitute the nightmare it potentially can and we ordered just before a line of people that surely would have tested patience. After narrowly escaping an ordering fiasco we ventured outside to sit and enjoy the coming dusk on the early summer day.

Once we stepped onto the patio we immediately confronted color. First and foremost the color. A bright piñata of colors. The color helped establish the entire atmosphere. Then, layer upon layer added to the foundation like a growing onion. The colors based a math equation that summed in a feeling of authenticity for the customer. Sitting outside, in the warm air, a bright mural painted on the brick wall before us depicted male and female Mexicans. The mid-fiesta Mexicans displayed the desired attitude for patrons. 

Between the festive wall and us, a 3 piece band played. The music supplied the very sounds of tradition. To my side, another group at a table sat above an unmoving scruffy brownish grey old dog. It looked like a bigger version of a terrier or something and to my mind didn’t have a name (see ColdWarKids: Mexican Dogs). This mutt added greatly to the ambience simply by doing nothing. Just laying there and being. And “mutt” perfectly describes him. Not his origin. I don’t happen to have a clue as to his pedigree. But when thinking of a “mutt” one conjures up this specific animal. 

Finally, the actually important part of a restaurant, the food. A sample platter of various tacos arrived from the kitchen via the waiter. Now the hint of a Mexican smell that surrounded the patio area rose up strongly from directly in front of us.

The food provided the sense of traveling to a foreign land in the best possible way. Just the right cocktail of the familiar with the unfamiliar. A dash of excitement added a hint of spice that paired it perfectly with the surroundings as if a sommelier made the selection for us.

Truthfully, I don't recall much of the meal. I simply know that it was good and that I would like to eat there again sometime. It was an atmospheric explosion that knocked me over. That I remember. Normally an establishment doesn't attempt to surpass  the quality of the meal with the aura surrounding it. Usually I would agree that the surroundings don't matter much if the main event doesn't live up to billing. Thing is, the surroundings here dazzled so much that I possess an inkling we ate good food, and now I'm more than willing to extend the benefit of the doubt to Guisados. I'm looking forward to eventually SMOR food there.

Musical Monday 4/25/16

Even now, after death, Prince continues to be prolific, kinda. His influence still spreads across many aspects of life.

I didn’t see it but, apparently SNL issued a retrospective of Prince performances. Jimmy Fallon hosted and also offered a recap of Prince’s performance at the 40th anniversary of SNL afterparty. I am not completely familiar with all of Prince’s extensive catalogue, but this one performance (like his Superbowl halftime show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NN3gsSf-Ys) provides a good idea of the concept of him for those searching for a more complete encapsulation. A video of the after show performance exists and it’s legitimately cool. I loved seeing a bunch of popular people at the celebration jam along to Prince as he sings. http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/news/a44279/prince-snl-40-afterparty-video-fallon/

On top of that, Bruce Springsteen, someone I am more familiar with most of the work (but definitely not all), opened a recent show with Purple Rain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkOxeKA2WNE And, still, in Jenga fashion the tributes stack higher, at LACMA (Los Angeles County Museum of Art) there’s a exhibit called the “rain room.” In the “Rain Room” I guess you stand in the center and it rains around you but not on you. From all reports it looks pretty cool. 

After the surprising revelation of Prince’s death, the “rain room” rained down purple colored rain in Prince’s honor. http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-prince-dies-live-up-lacma-pays-tribute-with-a-purple-rain-room-1461365880-htmlstory.html 

While it doesn’t cleanse the sorrow from those missing Prince’s presence, the tributes serve as a touching reminder of Prince’s wide influence.

Freedom Friday 4/22/16

I don’t know if you heard the news, but Prince died yesterday. If you didn’t, I’ve got some bad news, Prince died yesterday. Prince, the musician adorned in purple, not some foreign royalty. His death forced me to concentrate on him rather than putting forth the other Pulitzer worthy material I originally had ready to go. 

Prince was only 57 or something like that. I didn’t know of any serious illness except the flu or pneumonia kind of recently, I think. Those factors were just a few that served in making the occurrence a fairly big surprise. No one saw this coming.

But also, one big factor serves to make it not at all surprising. Sad yes. Surprising no. The factor is something that we all kind of ignore as long as possible. It only happens when expected, right? That is, WE ALL DIE.

Every single one of us dies. Everyone you have known or will know dies. Even Prince, whose amorphic nature seemed to exempt him from some of the basic human qualities, he died. He was subject to the same rules and, as such, suffered the same fate we all will, thus proving his humanity.

Rather than be surprised at how a life came to an end we should admire the depth of the accomplishment with in that life. I only single out recent famous deaths because those life’s events may be more well known to more people. Specifically look at Glenn Fry, David Bowie, and Garry Shandling. In some ways all these deaths were also surprising. In others they weren’t. But regardless of expectations, look at all they each accomplished in their times and how, if you even tangentially know of them, they somehow touched your life through their work (I’m assuming that you weren’t close friends but I guess who knows). Point is, they each were subject to the same fate as you. No one really knows what continued influence these sound and style servers might have levied. One can predict by projecting the past on the future but all one can really know is what actually happened.

Speaking of predicting, one predicts by looking at repeated behavior from the past and then transferring that behavior to the future. So, since 100% of people have died, one could, to a high degree of certainty, predict a person will die. That, close to certain, outcome dictates that we should change our perspective from one where a death is a surprise to one where, because of assumed death, continued life is a surprise. Then the output from the sum of all the days that didn’t result in death is, in fact, surprising.

The end result is still the same. We are still astounded by the accomplishments achieved in the life. But now, due to a change in perspective, we are surprised by the life instead of surprised by the death. 

I feel like that perspective may serve to improve every moment this weekend as it happens instead of solely reflecting upon moments after the fact. So go forth, now armed with a fresh perspective that Prince provided, and savor each moment as they happen because you will die someday, it’s pretty much guaranteed.

MAGIC

Magic

What you see is not necessarily what you get

It’s an illusion

It plays with your expectations

It’s Magic

 

A tank of water

A deck of cards

Steel rings

A large box and a saw

All tools of the trade

 

“Um, well, you see, there are…”

Blah blah blah

Eventually someone will figure it out.

Someone has the answer. 

Someone will explain why it’s a sham.

 

Is it mirrors?

Must be mirrors.

Is it smoke?

Must be smoke.

Is it magnets?

Must be magnets.

 

How about lasers?

Oh, I know, computers!

Whatever is happening I don’t understand.

But I do know what it's not.

It can’t be magic.

Theatre Thursday 4/21/16

We, as a society, are quickly descending down a hole of streaming content. In some ways the eager gorging makes sense. For the most part, past show times and content were dictated to us. Options dramatically increased as cable networks and premium channels grew out of network TV. Compared to now, where entire seasons drop all at once, we still had fairly limited choices. Now, in our brave new world, only self-control stands between us and the hefty stream of material at our finger tips. Turns out that human beings aren’t necessarily that great at self-control.

Binge watching or bingeing integrates a term that already implies excess. We reflexively derisively refer to it, recognizing the negative potential that so much so quickly entails. The problem isn’t necessarily in the provider. It’s amazing and wonderful that so much high quality content can arrive all at once. The problem lies in the viewer’s self-discipline. We determine, for better or worse, our own fate.

For certain shows I really miss the longer opportunity to digest material. I liked reading well-thought out material and hearing well formulated opinions.

I’m basing most of my opinions on experiences with moderate to heavy use of Netflix, very light use of Amazon Prime, and living American life. Based on those experiences I would suggest, surprise surprise to those who know me, adopting a middle ground. “Everything in moderation, even moderation - Oscar Wilde (I think).”

I believe a season should only drop 1/2 at a time. In essence it would just end up createng two shorter seasons in one, but with the opportunity for season long story arcs to span the length. This approach could even potentially start only in the second season once response is established and gauged. In my view this method would allow both the service to advertise more while also allowing the viewer a little more time to digest. I know the era of the full single episode recaps no longer exists but this way, partial season recaps could issue along with an additional opportunity for speculation. Netflix or Amazon Prime or Hulu could advertise season 2.5 or 3.5 while also allowing additonal time for the audience to really chew on the material. 

I know, for me specifically, I benefit greatly from an extended chance to rehash material. Part of the benefit to everyone involved is making it more memorable - which I would assume platforms would want (?). In fact, there have even been whole movies that escaped my memory partially because they were never reiterated to me. A mediocre movie may contribute to my lack of recollection as well as no reiteration but the risk of non-success should have factored in well before the reiteration stage. In fact none of the potential negatives that already exist with the production of content really change much. The only thing that really changes is that the opportunity for discussion and advertising and marketing increases with some additional paticience from the audience. 

In reality, a person would have a difficult time viewing an entire season of something in one sitting (and while I know they do, I don’t really want to encourage it). It’s called bingeing for a reason and just as I don't see excessive consumption of drugs as a plus I don’t see excessive consumption of media content as a plus either.

I think the way I propose providing content still allows for large intake but the intake is slightly regulated by circumstance. And that regulation allows for the content to play a more prevelant role in life. Additionally, each episode takes on more importance and must therefore be better because it comprises a larger proportion of the segment from which it came. Self-discipline it seems doesn’t have too much of a downside.

Unfortunately, what I suggest will never happen. Something being “bad for people” won’t necessarily discourage anyone. If one platform decides to limit content a competitor will release all at once and consumers, thinking that bigger must be better, more is always preferable to less, won’t take the time to consider the nuances. In the American fashion, they will simmply choose to have more sooner and the marketplace will eliminate the more deliberate option. Of course, in the same way, any one addicted to a drug is going to choose more of that drug over health. It’s the same here.

In the end providers just listen to the viewers. If the viewers signify a desire for a more thoughtful delivery then maybe the providers won’t feel obligated to quickly spew it all out at once.

Wildcard Wednesday 4/20/16

I find lists tremendously helpful. They provide a mainline of information. While the article that contains them may be perused once or so, it’s always helpful to have a list to return to. I previously posted a link to a list of the “dirty dozen.” It provides a tally of the items that harbor the most pesticides to aid in your decision making process. Sure the wisdom or logic involved in anything is open to attack but that attack doesn’t subvert the shorthand value. Critiques of the list fail to appreciate that the list doesn’t always need to be perfect to be useful. Here’s an alternative list. It’s shorter. 

Organic = Yes. 

Non-organic = No. 

It’s a much cleaner, much healthier, much simpler organizer. Unfortunately that’s not very realistic. So, if you would like to play in the real world, here is an alternative. An update to the “dirty dozen.”

http://www.takepart.com/article/2016/04/12/most-contaminated-fruits-and-veggies

Taco Tuesday 4/19/16

We recently made, from scratch, ravioli. I don’t mean we purchased fresh ravioli and then boiled them, I mean we mixed and kneaded pasta dough, rolled it out, made a ravioli filling, filled ravioli in a mold, cut them out, and boiled them. It was a lot of work. 

We don’t own a pasta maker of any sort and the significant elbow grease required made me very appreciative of the existence of pasta makers, very appreciative of being able to buy pasta, and very appreciative of the fact that pre-pasta makers and the availability of store-bought pasta, some homemakers made pasta regularly. 

The result tasted alright but I could see the potential that the creation contained. I could see that with repetition our skill could increase substantially. And I believed that our living kitchen-patron-saint, Michael Pollan, would approve of our arduous efforts. The effort required underscored the wisdom of large batch cooking and in turn, if you’re the one doing the cooking, of left-overs.

At the same time, to compliment our creation, we made a ragu-type pasta sauce. This much more common exercise turned out fairly well. While it benefited from owning an immersion blender to break it up a bit, something everyone with any interest in your own cooking creations with limited space should make the room for, it probably would have still tasted at least adequate with out one. I think regardless of whether or not you own an immersion blender, making the sauce utilized many ingredients we would purchase anyway as well as many ingredients that otherwise contribute to a health.

So, not only did our experiment result in a vast amount of tasty food, it also increased our appreciation for the endeavor and probably resulted in a good work out too. Surprise surprise to any other adherent to Michael Pollan’s philosophies, I support the idea of making your own ravioli or other pasta, at least once.